Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Why The Booker Prize Is Bad For Literature

"There are at least two reasons why almost every anglophone novelist feels compelled to get as near the Booker Prize as they can. The first is because it looms over them and follows them around in the way Guy de Maupassant said the Eiffel Tower follows you everywhere when you're in Paris." Even so, writes Amit Chaudhuri, "I'm not saying that the Booker shouldn't exist. I'm saying that it requires an alternative, and the alternative isn't another prize."



Article source here:Arts Journal

No comments:

Post a Comment

Academy Decides Not To Bar Streaming Movies From Oscars

The board of governors of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences “left intact Rule Two, the one that established that a film” — in...